Bill Godshall – Institute of Medicine report to FDA on Smokeless Tobacco an Outrage

Bill Godshall – Institute of Medicine report to FDA on Smokeless Tobacco an Outrage

Institute of Medicine urges FDA to protect deadly cigarettes from market competition by far less hazardous smokefree tobacco alternatives.

Bill Godshall, Executive Director of Smokefree PennsylvaniaThe new Institute of Medicine (IOM) committee report on Modified Risk Tobacco Products is terrible for public health because it urges the FDA to protect deadly cigarettes from market competition by far less hazardous smokefree alternatives.

The IOM committee is basically urging the FDA to impose a several hundred million dollar tax on any tobacco company before it could truthfully inform smokers that a smokeless tobacco product is less hazardous than cigarettes.

While the report correctly points out that NRT products pose virtually no health risks, it ignores a half century a evidence documenting that smokeless tobacco products in Sweden and the US have very similar health risks/benefit profiles as NRT products.

The IOM committee report also ignores the undeniable evidence that several million smokers in the US and Sweden have already switched to smokeless tobacco products, and have significantly reduced their disease risks by doing so.

The IOM committee’s recommendation would require a tobacco company to conduct far more research than FDA requires drug companies to conduct on NRT products before they can be marketed as smoking cessation aids.

Smokers have a human right to truthful health information about far less hazardous alternatives to cigarettes. But this IOM committee obviously disagrees.

In sum, the IOM committee’s report protects cigarettes at the expense of public health, human rights and the truth.

Bill Godshall
Executive Director
Smokefree Pennsylvania
1926 Monongahela Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15218

smokefree@compuserve.com

Why IS IOM's Logo of an angry snake?  Truth in advertising?

Previous Save Our Snus! FDA Comment Period Extended
Next New Camel SNUS Ads: Let it Snus, FDA!

About author

You might also like

Op Ed & Guest Columnists

Snus Shopping News

This is an interesting time for Swedish snus users around the world.  I’m not talking the EU Tobacco Products Directive, the crazy American FDA, or other political stuff about tobacco. 

Op Ed & Guest Columnists

Bill Godshall – New Study shows Snus most effective in Quitting Smoking

Study: Snus more effective and prevalent than NRT for quitting smoking among Norwegian men A new study (abstract below) found that snus (despite being demonized by anti-tobacco extremists and government

Op Ed & Guest Columnists

Dr. Brad Rodu on Reduced Harm Tobacco

Dr. Brad Rodu is one of the pioneers in establishing that Reduced Harm products such as any form of smokeless tobacco including snus and Swedish Snus are, as he said