Written by Andrew Romeo Sunday, 28 June 2009 16:33
Just what happened to Joe Camel?
Joe Camel celebrates the brand's 75th anniversary. The anti-tobacco book-burners have made it difficult to get accurate information on exactly when he was created. An early form of Joe Camel appeared in a 1963 poster so he as at least that old.
Current history states that RJR Nabisco apparently grabbed “New Joe” Camel off of some French, and then-international ads from the late 1970s as a way to commemorate the brand’s 75th anniversary worldwide in 1988.
“Old Joe” has been strutting his ‘stuff’on the Camel packs since 1913. All legal. Traditional CPG marketing.
In 1991, it was recognized by the Journal of the American Medical Association that more American five and six-year olds knew Joe Camel than knew Fred Flintstone and Mickey Mouse.
They didn’t evaluate “Wacky Racers,” “Davey and Goliath,” or “Tennessee Tuxedo,” because, if they had, they would have been caught assuming that kids born in the mid 1980’s knew lots about cartoon characters from the ‘30s and the late ‘60s. They didn't.
Mickey was fresh off a 30-year creative hiatus, and Fred and Barney were canceled for good in 1966. And guess who the Flintstones’ target audience was back then? Not kids. Check out this commercial flashback of the past.
And by 1991, the show’s dumbed-down reruns and kid-friendly re-boots were long off the air. Ironically, the “Pebbles” line of breakfast cereals at the time was owned by Philip Morris!
The JAMA was, like many medical conglomerations, literary or otherwise, making a tobacco marketing claim based on a Fox News style bait-and-switch: the assumption that our own childhood memories of Mickey and Fred are eternally passed on to the next generations by the media. They are not.
This use of iconic TV characters from our own childhoods resonated with parents, even though kids were generally unaware of their existences. Their kids probably saw Joe on billboards weekly on the way to the mall, school or soccer practice, whereas the Flintstones and Mickey were unknown due to non-exposure on TV.
As with “Campaign for Tobacco Free Kids,” there is a distinct lack of real marketing knowledge, and a poignant, and possibly deliberate absence of field-marketing expertise in these ‘expert’ reports. If these same "researchers" had used “Garfield” and “Rugrats” instead, the results of their report would have been far different. “Old Joe” may have survived. The skill here is more shock PR and propaganda, which, when used properly, convinces intelligent adults that 2+2 must equal 5.
Fast forward to today. “Old Joe/Joe Camel” is back in the news as the catalyst of the looming disaster that is now law: Kennedy/Waxman. Philip Morris, in its unholy alliance with the “CTFK” and the US Federal Government, has helped to resurrect Joe’s spirit just as RJR has come out against the bill as being a ‘market-share freeze’ for PMUSA, and all combustible, tobacco products that compete with Marlboro.
It is. “Old Joe” was put to rest eleven years ago. Yet he is mentioned posthumously in many of the news articles of the past two weeks. In effect, RJR is being brought to the altar to have its current expanded “Camel” cigarette portfolio put under the microscope by new flavor regulations based on the logo’s supposed legacy. “Old Joe” cannot have his eternal rest.
The point of this article is not to defend cigarette advertising. Cigarettes are harmful to one’s health. There can be no doubt. The law should lead to an eventual ad ban, as it has in all EU countries. It doesn’t.
The issue is that by creating a stimulating and noisy case for ‘marketing to kids,’ despite lack of empirical proof of its existence in 2009, it frees up Big Tobacco to continue legally advertising to adults 18 and up. It is a diversionary tactic: Create an enemy to attract the government’s well-meaning liberals and the screaming mob. Get them all to agree to stop the nefarious plot against our kids and….
High-Fives in Washington that a “meaningful” anti-tobacco law has finally been passed are being met with High-Fives 200 miles south in Richmond, VA because nothing has changed.
Now…1000 feet from a school…That can be measured diagonally too, no?
ANDREW ROMEO
Live from New York on SnusCENTRAL.org
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
8 Comments
FeedAdd Comment
The Latest News from SnusCENTRAL
-
A Snus Horror Story Being a fan of Phantom Blue portions and loose, I had for some unexplainable...
-
Nordic American Smokeless v2 - Is there Life after Taboca? I've written a number of generally not favorable articles about Nordic...
-
The Nanny States of America - Part Two Welcome to the Nanny States of America; Part Two. In the first part...
-
FDA Panel Takes on Menthol in March 2010! Voting Members of FDA Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee...
-
An Open Letter to the American Tobacco Companies Dear Tobacco Sirs and/or Madam(s), If you are considering making...
-
THE NANNY STATE: RUSSIAN STYLE - Introduction Preface: Andrew Romeo and Russia Having moved from the mother’s...
-
Thunder Frosted Long + Portion Snus: First Look at a New Type of Snus Back in September of 2009 when I wrote First Review: 0102 Lab Series...
-
The Tobacco Act: Wasted Taxpayer Dollars and the new Tobacco Black Market The best of intentions carry unintended consequences. In the case...
-
Flavored Tobacco Ban in NYC Starts Next Week...maybe When the New York City Council voted overwhelming to ban flavored...
-
A Year of Snus - a Personal Case Study of 2009 This time last year I lost my job; Feb 20th to be exact. Within days...
-
Triumph Snus KILLED by Lorillard Don't look for Triumph Snus anymore. The rumors that Triumph Snus...
-
General Mint White Portion Snus: Much more than a Snus Review The long awaited and begged for General Mint White Portion Snus from...
-
Bill Godshall - The UK NHS Supports Tobacco Harm Reduction EDITOR's NOTE: Bill Godshall checked in with some (amazingly) positive...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10



Larry Waters makes this comment
Sunday, 28 June 2009
Fred H-H makes this comment
Sunday, 28 June 2009
Please ditch the white on black text! PLEASE!
Andrew Romeo makes this comment
Sunday, 28 June 2009
The very existence of cigarette ads was enough to 'mainstream' the product for me as a teenager. The iconic images contained therein were meaningless. Cigarettes were like Pampers, Mr. Clean and Pepsi...consumer products for sale.
Larry Waters makes this comment
Sunday, 28 June 2009
paulreece42 makes this comment
Monday, 29 June 2009
I started smoking Camels because of the advertised "Turkish & Domestic" blend, and automatically assumed that all things, even tobacco products, are better if they're foreign. You know, it's not like America was colonized because of its excellent tobacco or anything...
Thank God I've gotten smarter and realized that foreign stuff is not always better! Oh wait, I'm posting on a Swedish snus site. Maybe I haven't learned, but that's a good thing in this case!
I think it's silly to ban any advertising. Pretending it doesn't exist doesn't make it go away, especially when roughly a quarter of the population is advertising their products every day via real life product placement. What a silly, feel-good law tobacco advertising bans are.
Andrew Romeo makes this comment
Wednesday, 01 July 2009
"Turkish" tobaccoes are traditionally darker and somewhat strong tasting. But just because it's "Turkish" doesn't mean it's grown in Turkey.
All snus is produced with imported tobaccos, especially the stems of hi-nic rustica, which has traditionally come from India, Philippines or even South America.
Sometimes you'll see a claim that a snus contains "Cuban tobacco" (Montecristo/Romeo y Julieta) or "tobacco grown in Gotland" (Jakobssons, I believe), and the claims are true. But generally, this tobacco is added in to give character to the bouquet and flavor, but is not the source of the nicotine "hit."
feck makes this comment
Wednesday, 01 July 2009
The reason that they used real Turkish tobacco back then was more of a publicity thing to tie in with the whole "exotic" motif they were trying to cultivate.
Joe Camel was resurrected in 1987, but he appeared way back in the fifties, at least as early as 1953. He wasn't the original "cartoon cigarette icon", though. His creation stemmed from RJ Reynolds trying to compete with Kool's mascot "Willie the Penguin" who was so popular he even had his own comic book (recommended for "school age" children). Willie later faded into obscurity, but in a reversal of fortunes decades later, B&W resurrected him in 1991 as a trash talking, hip "punk" penguin directly aimed at fellow "cool guy" rebels Spuds McKenzie and Joe Camel. The campaign didn't go over so well, and arguably Willie The Penguin was much more of a "youth focused" marketing campaign than Joe Camel ever was. Nobody remembers Willie the Penguin though, just Old Joe.
Andrew Romeo makes this comment
Friday, 03 July 2009
I find the 1990's Philip Morris "Talk to your children about smoking" ads far more troubling.