Sunday, February 05, 2012
SnusCentral
Facebook Group Facebook Page Linked In Group Twitter
Translate Site:

Bill Godshall Responds to FDA on Tobacco Regulations

Bill Godshall of Smokefree Pennsylvania to FDA Tobacco Czar Lawrence Deyton

There are just days remaining (December 28 is the deadline) to submit public comments to the US FDA on tobacco regulations.   Here is where you can find more information about FDA tobacco regulations.  In public comments submitted on September 28, Smokefree Pennsylvania urged the FDA to:

  • truthfully inform smokers and the public that smokefree tobacco/nicotine products are far less hazardous alternatives to cigarettes, and that millions of smokers have already reduced their health risks by switching to smokefree tobacco/nicotine products,
  • eliminate the misleading "This product is not a safe alternative to cigarettes" warning on smokeless products,
  • eliminate the unsubstantiated "This product may cause mouth cancer" warning from snus and other low nitrosamine smokeless products,
  • require a warning on all cigarette packs stating "Smokefree tobacco and nicotine products are less hazardous alternatives to cigarettes",
  • evaluate and publish the relative and comparable health risks of different tobacco/nicotine products,
  • establish stricter standers for "modified risk" and "reduced exposure" claims for cigarettes than for smokefree tobacco products,
  • oppose cigarette emission standards, as they would perpetuate the safer cigarette fraud because humans smoke differently than machines,
  • require a warning on all cigarette packs stating “There is no such thing as a safer cigarette, as all cigarettes are similarly hazardous",
  • approve NY State Health Commissioner Daines' petition to make NRT more accessible and affordable to smokers, and to change NRT pack warnings to provide comparable health benefit and risk information about NRT use versus continued cigarette use,
  • approve temporary and long term usage of NRT products for smokers and other tobacco users,
  • inform smokers and the public that most ex-smokers have quit cold turkey (not by using NRT or Rx products),
  • redefine electronic cigarettes as a new category of tobacco products, and propose reasonable and responsible e-cigarette regulations,
  • acknowledge huge declines in youth tobacco usage during past decade, and FDA's statutory and constitutional limitations to further reduce youth tobacco usage,
  • oppose banning menthol cigarettes, as doing so would create a huge black market, and
  • oppose bannning flavorings/additives in cigars or smokefree tobacco products.

Bill Godshall
Executive Director
Smokefree Pennsylvania

1926 Monongahela Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15218
smokefree@compuserve.com

[Editors Note:  Bill Godshall is a long-time anti-smoking activist.  He is now being called a traitor by many of his former colleagues.  He still is for the eventual elimination of cigarettes BUT sees smokeless tobacco, snus, and other methods as a way to achieve it without torturing nicotine-addicted current smokers in the process.

Bill and I do not agree on everything.  Our initial conversation was long and "interesting".   But I do support Bill Godshall because he is not an anti-all-tobacco zealot.  He recognizes there is a middle ground where both sides of tobacco debate can win. We can carry on a dialog; not just throw bumper-sticker remarks at each other. I wish more anti-cigarette/anti-all-tobacco advocates were as rational and thoughtful as Bill is.
LW
]

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites

3 Comments

Feed
  1. While I am generally opposed to most government involvement in the world of tobacco, I applaud Smokefree Pennsylvania's common sense approach to truthful legislation. Many hundreds of thousands of smokers die every year due to the government's refusal to acknowledge smokeless tobacco as a safer alternative for those like myself who absolutely could not quit nicotine.

    I'm personally kind of torn about how E Cigs should be handled. They're technically not tobacco products, though they do distribute nicotine just like gums or patches, so I feel that they should be regulated in some fashion. Just in theory and based on what limited scientific research has been done on them, they are a much safer alternative to cigarettes and I know many who have quit with E Cig technology (all it made me want to do was smoke even more real cigarettes, but that's just me). I feel that the approach that the FDA is taking right now keeps this potentially life-saving technology in a sort of legal limbo.

    While former smokers are turning to the unregulated wild frontier of Chinese "labs" for their E Cigs, an American manufacturer could be churning out safe, reasonably priced pharmaceutical-regulated E Cigs under the government's watchful eye. Instead, our legislators are attempting to limit a legitimate harm reduction product while they're busy trying to figure out whether they should label it fish or fowl, and to what end would allow them the most tax revenue. Meanwhile, it's the smokers that are attempting a safer alternative that are getting the short end.

    Pontius Pilate, when faced with the most unenviable task, asked aloud "What is truth?" Let us hope that someone in Washington asks the same question and recognizes your efforts Mr. Godshall (as well as all of ours) for being what they are.
  2. Well said, Bill. I would take exception to the implication of stating 95% of all ex-smokers quit cold turkey. Of those cigarette smokers who have managed to quit cold turkey (and good for them!), sadly over 95% of the nicotine-addicted return to cigarettes within 5 years of their quitting. I certainly did...many times.

    Those who do revert back to cigarettes often feel the cigarettes have beaten them and they just can't quit. If they try again, the attempt is much weaker and more unsuccessful.

    E-Cigarettes I'm a little uncomfortable with at this time for the same reasons Feck mentioned just as I am uncomfortable with the quality, manufacturing methods, ingredients, and intentions of practically all American snus manufacturers. The more I learn from behind the bamboo curtain about current e-cigarettes, their true nicotine content, and the intentions of Chinese manufacturers, the less comfortable I am. Like the Swedish Government did 30 years ago, FDA does need to step up and ensure that tobacco consumers are making informed decisions.

    Smokefree Pennsylvania's submission to FDA is a sensible, realistic, and common sense approach to tobacco regulation. I hope FDA has the willingness to take your recommendations to heart.

  3. Refreshing article. This fellow seems like he has a reasonable approach. Hopefully mindsets like his become the norm within our nation's legislative branches.

Add Comment

Banner
Subscribe to SnusCENTRAL for the latest Snus News, Commentary, and Snus Sales!
SnusCentral Newsletter
NO SPAM Guarantee: Our Newsletter is published only 1-2 times per month if that.

The Latest News from SnusCENTRAL

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

Ask Swedish Match

SnusCentral Login