Written by SnusCENTRAL.org Thursday, 21 May 2009 21:55
The following give the latest status on the current Congressional efforts to prohibit ALL Internet, Telephone, or Mail-Order delivery of Cigarettes and all Smokeless Tobacco Products including Snus to consumers within the United States of America. Cigars are of course, exempt.

H.R. 1676 is the House's version of the PACT Act; A bill to prevent tobacco smuggling, to ensure the collection of all tobacco taxes, and for other purposes.
May 21, 2009: This bill PASSED in the House of Representatives by roll call vote. The vote was held under a suspension of the rules to cut debate short and pass the bill, needing a two-thirds majority. This usually occurs for non-controversial legislation.
The totals were 397 Ayes, 11 Nays, 25 Present/Not Voting. (House of Representatives roll no. 287) The PACT Act has now moved on to the US Senate.
S. 1147 is the Senate's version of the PACT Act; A bill to prevent tobacco smuggling, to ensure the collection of all tobacco taxes, and for other purposes. It was introduced by Senator Herbert Kohl (D) of Wisconsin. His first co-sponsor was Senator Patrick Leahy (D)of Vermont.
On March 11 2010, the Senate in the dead of night Passed the PACT Act by Unanimous Consent. Days later, the House quickly Passed PACT overwhelmingly again. As of March 21, 2010, The PACT Act sits on President Obama's desk awaiting signature.
.....................
On March 31st, 2010, with very little fanfare or notice by the Press, President Obama signed the PACT Act into law. Implementation by BATF will begin in 90 Days.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
12 Comments
FeedAdd Comment
Lars-Erik Rutqvist: The Truth on Snus
-
Snus and Nicotine Some help understanding Snus and Nicotine Swedish Snus produces...
- 1
The Latest News from SnusCENTRAL
-
Snus News - General Long and Long Sterk Portion Snus General Long Portion Snus - The Snus Revolution Continues Swedish...
-
Gotlandssnus to release two new Jakobsson's Snus Flavors Jakobsson's Classic Strong Portion Snus and Jakobsson's Mint Portion...
-
Snus Camp Ok, I know there was supposed to be a third installment of Nanny States...
-
In Snus and in Life, Little Things Matter Little things matter: this is one of life’s simple truths. Two...
-
SnusCENTRAL News Letter - August 2010 *|MC:SUBJECT|* // Email not displaying...
-
Snus News - New Snus Catch Pure Mint UPDATED 23 AUG 2010 Swedish Match announced two new snus products...
-
Close, but no Snus - Camel SNUS Robust Review As my Grandpa used to say “Close only counts in horseshoes and hand...
-
Camel Robust and Winterchill SNUS - Is it Real Snus yet? About five weeks ago, Reynolds American officially revealed the existence...
-
This Week's FDA Tobacco Propaganda - 8/6/10 This Week in CTP -- Updates from the FDA Center for Tobacco Products...
-
New Camel SNUS Robust and Winterchill DEVELOPING: An official at Reynolds American today confirmed...
-
Obama Hears a Help Obama Hears a “Help!” A satirical poem by R.R. Hubbard (With...
-
Bill Godshall - New Study shows Snus most effective in Quitting Smoking Study: Snus more effective and prevalent than NRT for quitting smoking...
-
JTI Sweden - Interview with Snus Lord Per Andersson Much has changed for tobacco users in the month since I first started...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10









Sm0ke42o makes this comment
Saturday, 30 May 2009
wade epperson makes this comment
Sunday, 31 May 2009
James makes this comment
Sunday, 14 June 2009
Willie Williams makes this comment
Monday, 22 June 2009
Willie
Lee makes this comment
Saturday, 21 November 2009
Unanimous makes this comment
Wednesday, 24 March 2010
CorruptGov makes this comment
Monday, 21 June 2010
Bethany makes this comment
Monday, 19 July 2010
I would not mind paying taxes if i could get the same cigarette here in "stupid land".
Kimberly makes this comment
Tuesday, 27 July 2010
Darrell Meeks makes this comment
Wednesday, 18 August 2010
Lisa makes this comment
Saturday, 28 August 2010
Christine makes this comment
Tuesday, 31 August 2010
I contacted Sen. Durbin and Sen. Burris in Illinois to vote NO to the PACT ACT. I was told by both offices that this was to protect children from getting cigarettes through the mail. It is bad enough that we have people making these decisions, but the thing that really bothers me is that they have the audacity to INSULT our intelligence. We ALL know why this was passed under the radar...$$$$$$$$. What I cannot understand is, how they can ban a LEGAL product from going through our postal service? Whether you are a smoker or not you MUST wonder what is next?