Written by Mr. UNZ Friday, 06 June 2008 02:29
I was tinkering with The Unloading Zone's underbelly the other day and ran a report on the Keywords that were bringing my readers here. I was Amazed and Saddened by the amount of times "camel snus" came up!
Fellow Swedish Snus Lovers, it worse than you thought out there in America! I googled Camel SNUS and was horrified by the numbers of articles praising it and the incredible amount of misinformation about snus on the internet!
And the comments: They were enough to make you cry. Look at what these misbegotten naive souls are saying about Camel SNUS:
FROM THE PROPAGANDA MACHINE AT Camel SNUS / RJ REYNOLDS:
Finally! A person who looks at it with the facts! My parents and I work for RJ and I have personally tried Snus and i have to tell you the smokeless,spit-less tobacco gives a much bigger nicotine rush over a longer period of time when compared to cigarettes. Plus I didn't have any of the after effects of smoking. My breath and clothes didn't get a smell on them, and the frost snus actually improves your breath...it is much like a breath mint in that respect.
TWO PEOPLE "BELIEVED" THE Camel SNUS / RJ REYNOLDS PROPAGANDA GUY:
I bought a tin of Camel SNUS after reading your description. Though it was quite expensive and I get sick from any other type of smokeless tobacco, Camel Snus fulfills my nicotine cravings, so much so that I have quit smoking the Camel Filters that I adored so much!
AND
That's what I call harm reduction. Thank you for your optimistic point of view and open mind. I appreciate it, and so do my lungs! Reduced harm....but How Much Reduced Harm? Aside from the inhaled tar and carcinogens, what is the TSNA count (the non-inhaled tobacco carcinogens) of Camel SNUS? They won't release it.
And then the below, Mr. Wizard chimes in:
One thing I must mention is that Snus is meant to be refrigerated. If it is not properly refrigerated it will grow the same bacteria present in American Snuff....which perform anaerobic reactions producing toxic byproducts. After a week or so of non-refrigeration it is theorized that it will reach the same levels of toxins as American Snuff. Just make sure if you're using the stuff it is properly refrigerated or you're negating the lower risk of snus.
Really? Unopened Swedish and SOME American snus's (including Camel) do require refrigeration prior to opening the can. You can even freeze Swedish Snus for up to a year, like meat, to preserve the freshness. But Marlboro snus doesn't require refrigeration. Skoal snus doesn't require refrigeration. Why not?
A "PLANT" FROM Camel SNUS / RJ Reynolds:
I had a can of actual Swedish snus back in the day and it tasted horrible.
AND FINALLY, this pathetic exchange between "Tom",The Ugly (and confused) American, Confused "Anonymous 2", and Poor, Correct, (and while a little arrogant, he's correct just the same) "Anonymous".
Anonymous said... The first paragraph states snus is a tobacco product made in Sweden, this is correct. Next in parenthesis it is stated,(Camel is made there), as to imply Sweden. This is incorrect, Camel brand snus is made by the Conwood Company. They are located in Winston-Salem, North Carolina and are a subsidiary of RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company
Tom said... Sorry, unless something has changed, you're mistaken. It's made in Sweden under license by British American Tobacco.
http://tobaccoproducts.org/index.php/Camel_Snus (internet misinformation: who wouldn't be confused at this point?)
Anonymous 2 said... It is made in sweden and conwood company is a subsidiary of Reynolds American, not rj reynolds...snus is a reynolds product whereas kodiak and grizzly are conwood products
Anonymous said... The statement Conwood Company is a subsidiary of Reynolds American, not RJ Reynolds is true. Conwood produces Kodiak and Grizzly brand moist snuff. Conwood is contracted to produce Camel Brand Snus for Reynolds American. It is produced in Winston-Salem, NC.
CORRECT!

Tom said... Your point?
Anonymous said... camel "snus" is not snus. the only proper snus is from a proper swedish company (in my mind, the only proper snus is gröv lös and general portion, although taste may very). i've yet to try any american "snus" but, like most things american, i've got a feeling it'll be a cheap-knockoff of the real thing.
Then Tom said...(to the embarrassment of all America) Wow. That sounds so terribly elitist. (You're right, it does sound elitist: the sad thing is, he's right.) (Not to mention profoundly stupid). If it's American, it must be of low quality. If it's European, it must be of superior quality. You haven't even tried it, which immediately invalidates your opinion. You, Sir, have issues.
NO, Tom, you poor misguided soul: you have issues...with the FACTS. Not your fault really: how many Americans even HEARD of snus before Camel and Marlboro came out with their version? Add to that websites with bad information, misleading marketing,and sloppy research, and of course you're confused.
Compare Swedish Snus side by side with the current American "snus", and in every way, American Snus is inferior.And if you check the Official Camel SNUS web site: R.J. Reynolds Tobacco themselves state that Camel SNUS is made in Winston-Salem, NC.
The Swedish have had over 200 years to perfect snus. They take PRIDE in it! It's not just "another product" to the Swedish. OK, maybe I'm romanticizing it a little, but Scandinavian Snus sure is better than American Snus. This wouldn't be happening if Ronald Reagan were still President!
Camel and Marlboro came up with their so-called snus in a laboratory within the last 3-5 years or so.
I decided to visit the Camel SNUS web site to get their latest take. The FAQ page alone would make you want to cry. (but the site was very pretty) The following is from The Offical R.J. Reynolds Camel SNUS Website as of June 6th, 2008:
QUESTION: Why are there only 15 pouches in a can instead of 20 now
ANSWER: Simple answer: Product Freshness. We want Camel SNUS to be as fresh as possible. Based on what consumers told us, they were using fewer than twenty pouches on a regular basis. By reducing the pouch count from 20 to 15, it ensures that Camel SNUS is the freshest snus possible, from the first pouch to the last one in the tin. Couple this with the fact that we now have 50% larger pouches, there is actually more Camel SNUS in a tin than when we had 20 pouches in a tin
QUESTION: Why are the pouches bigger?
ANSWER: 1 Reason: consumer feedback. Camel SNUSers told us that they would prefer to have more tobacco in each pouch.
QUESTION: How much bigger are the pouches?
ANSWER: 50%
QUESTION: How big is the individual pouch?
ANSWER: The individual Camel SNUS pouch is small and weighs about 0.6 grams
OH MY POOR AMERICAN SNUS USER'S and CIGARETTE SMOKERS CURIOUS ABOUT SNUS!
A can of Camel SNUS has 15, 0.6 grams "pouches". A can of REAL Swedish Snus has 24 "pouches" (they're really called Portions, by the way. Thanks Camel for making American snus users SOUND like idiots too.) with 1.0 gram per portion!
That means when you buy a can of Camel SNUS, you get 15 portions of 0.6gr each or only 9 grams of Camel SNUS.
When you buy REAL SWEDISH SNUS, you get 24 portions of 1.0gr. each or 24 grams of real, reduced harm Snus!!!
In other words, the Camel SNUS Costs MORE for almost 2 and a half times LESS snus! And don't forget what Camel answered as to why the "pouches" were bigger: "1 Reason: consumer feedback. Camel SNUSers told us that they would prefer to have more tobacco in each pouch."
Camel, you call two and a half time LESS tobacco MORE? And by the way Camel, it's not just "tobacco" in the "pouch": it's Snus; in your case SNUS (of which tobacco is the main, but not only ingredient) and they come in PORTIONS, not "pouches"! Let me back up: tobacco is SUPPOSED to be the main ingredient. I have no idea if there is any in Camel SNUS. I certainly can't taste it over....whatever it is you call flavoring.
YOUR 0.6 gram portions are called "mini". 1.0 gram SWEDISH Portions are called either "Large" or "Regular".
Brothers and Sisters, once again the big corporate man (in the case of Camel, woman)is taking advantage of the people!They're selling us less than half a bag of their so-called "snus" for more than the price of a full bag!
And Camel says their SNUS last up to 30 minutes. REAL SWEDISH Snus can last HOURS!
We must EDUCATE the American People! We must bring them to the path of righteous Snus from Sweden! We must take them out of the wilderness of Big American Tobacco and into the heaven that REAL Snus can be!
And I haven't forgotten about YOU, Marlboro Man! I am just so distraught I can't bring myself to go to YOUR website right now.
WE will show you the way! Others True to the knowledge of REAL SNUS will help too! Because unlike cigarettes, where we all knew (or thought we knew) the risks, NOT knowing the difference between Swedish Snus and American "snus" CAN be unnecessarily harmful to your health!
So,with some of my teachings, the help of others, a mountain of FACTS, and a 10% off coupon code you can enter the first time you Buy Snus from The Snus Store at SnusCENTRAL, a true home for the Swedish Snus lover and YOUR Snus Community Home, we're here to help and embrace you.
COME INTO THE LIGHT! We will be there to Guide You!!! And trust me, the first time you try REAL Swedish Snus will be the LAST time you buy American snus!
I came from where you are and have seen the light! Follow Me!
Mr. UNZ
Activist Snus Guru
Shining the Light of Truth from SnusCENTRAL.org
June 6th, 2008
Additional Information:
EXPOSED: Why there IS a "Unique" American Snus TasteAmerican Smokers Exploited by Big Tobacco - Part 3: Camel SNUS
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
40 Comments
FeedAdd Comment
The Latest News from SnusCENTRAL
-
Philip Morris, Swedish Snus, and the Parliament brand in Russia Parliament has been a popular cigarette in Russia since the late 1990s....
-
Parliament Swedish Snus is Here...sort of According to SnusCIA sources, Parliament Snus from Philip Morris International...
-
New V2 Tobacco snus factory starts production V2 Tobacco, Denmark's largest snus manufacturer, announced their new...
-
New General Snus, Catch Snus, and Goteborgs Rapé Snus for 2012 Swedish Match today announced the the upcoming release of new General...
-
Thunder Chrome Series Snus Discontinued Goodbye Thunder Chrome but Coffee Supreme will return V2 Tobacco...
-
New Camel SNUS Ads: Let it Snus, FDA! Reynolds American launch a new series of Camel SNUS print ads today...
-
Bill Godshall - Institute of Medicine report to FDA on Smokeless Tobacco an Outrage Institute of Medicine urges FDA to protect deadly cigarettes from...
-
Save Our Snus! FDA Comment Period Extended FDA has extended the time for public comment on the sale and advertising...
-
Swedish Match Snus News from October 2011 Swedish Match, the world's largest manufacturer of Swedish snus, was...
-
The Nanny States of America, Part 3 When I first started writing for SnusCentral I was under the understanding...
-
Snus News and Snus Lord Moe Unz is back! As I always say after I am cut off at the local pub, "I shall return!"...
-
Going Extreme: Odens EXTREME Snus by GNT Odens Extreme Swedish Snus series was the first snus to break the...
-
Beyond Extra Strong: Thunder RAW Frosted Ultra Strong Snus V2 Tobacco publicly announced they are launching their highest nicotine...
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10











Larry Waters makes this comment
Thursday, 28 February 2008
If you go to my FAQ for Folks New to Swedish Snus, you'll find the Store Locator link for US tobacco shops selling their product. I hope MN is on it! If not, you've always got the mail-order option from Sweden. I recommend SnusCentral.com (surprised?). Click on one of their banners on my First time Customers get 10% their first order by using this Discount Code at Checkout: LV2F8F Good luck!
Larry Waters makes this comment
Monday, 23 June 2008
Larry Waters makes this comment
Monday, 23 June 2008
Larry Waters makes this comment
Wednesday, 25 June 2008
It just goes to show the power of evil (and from the folks who invented Eclipse, too!)...it corrupts both innocents and Big Business alike!
LORD, just give me the strength (and some cash would help too) to go on teaching the wonders of Swedish Snus in this American wilderness! I'm battling SATAN himself on this one! Please give me strength!
Larry Waters makes this comment
Friday, 27 June 2008
Larry Waters makes this comment
Saturday, 28 June 2008
Larry Waters makes this comment
Thursday, 09 October 2008
Larry Waters makes this comment
Thursday, 09 October 2008
I don't mind your post but it would be a lot more valuable if you were more specific....
If you could specify in what WAY(S) I'm "kind of a douche", I could address your points specifically.......
In fact, I can't tell if you're talking about me or the person who commented above you......
"Douche" I'll publish: F--k, S--t, and words like that I won't so if you do come back, keep your language civil, specify your issue(s) and I'll be happy to post and address them......
And thanks for stopping by and taking the time to....kind of..comment. I appreciate it!
Sincerely,
Mr. UNZ
Larry Waters makes this comment
Tuesday, 04 November 2008
Larry Waters makes this comment
Thursday, 06 November 2008
Did you ACTUALLY READ THIS ARTICLE? I was having some fun but the facts are the facts. Let's straighten some stuff out first:
1. I'm an American AND a TEXAN, served my Country in the US Air Force and very proud of all the above (truth in disclosure: I've only been a Texan since 2000...I'm originally from New Jersey).
2. I smoked Camel and cigarettes made EXCLUSIVELY by R.J. Reynolds Tobacco for over 30 years. I also knew the risks (I thought).
3. I switched to Camel Lights because light cigarettes, we were told, had less tar and were a little less dangerous.
Last week's news was THAT's A LIE! Maybe in a carefully constructed mechanical test inhaler, they measured less tar, but REAL LIFE STUDIES now with REAL cigarette smokers show "Light" cigarettes are NO DIFFERENT than Regular Filtered cigarettes regarding the amount of tar the smoker inhales.
I'll skip over Eclipse so-called reduced harm cigarettes from RJRT as I switched to them after lights and the only negative I'm aware of so far is that they have considerably more carbon monoxide than conventional cigarettes. And RJRT told me that up front. In a few years, studies will come out with all the facts, one way or the other.
3. If you read my first article on snus, you'll find I started with CamelSNUS...the original that contained only 0.4 grams of product! Because I was BRAND LOYAL.
4. They tasted..OK and as you apparently have, I would have gotten used to them because they are 8mg of nicotine. But CamelSNUS was STILL expensive. So I went Internet shopping: there wasn't much on CamelSNUS as they had just "invented" it, but there was a lot on Swedish Snus since it's over 200 years old.
5. Lucky me, the Dallas area of Texas was, and is, still one of the only places you can buy CamelSNUS, Marlboro snus, and Swedish Snus over-the-counter....all within 5 minutes of my house.
6. That first article describes my nervously opening the tin and seeing something that looked completely different than the CamelSNUS. There were more portions, it was cheaper than CamelSNUS, the pouches looked different.....BUT THE TASTE!!!!
Filet Minion over Dog Food!
7. What you are suffering from is a new problem which I've written about and not going to repeat again except to say that nicotine, which is more addicting than heroin, will over-ride your taste-buds. Whatever you get very used to in taste becomes your basis of comparison.
If you look at the older comments in this and other posts and compare them to more recent ones now that CamelSNUS has been out longer, the more that "base taste" sets in. People have a tougher time adjusting from dog food to steak. Because of the nicotine.
The few times I tried to stop smoking cigarettes, I would smoke fine cigars. Huge taste difference! Cigarette tobacco is the cheapest sweepings off the floor in the tobacco world.
And when I eventually went BACK to cigarettes because I am nicotine-addicted, the first one tasted TERRIBLE...but by the end of the week I was back up to a pack and half to two packs a day. Because of the nicotine.
Why do I mention Camel more than other "American" snus?
Two reasons: they're in the most markets and if you read my first article on Triumph, you'll understand the Susan Ivey of Reynolds America knows that whomever sets that "base taste" first has the big advantage.
Unlike Europe, Americans ARE uniquely brand-loyal when it comes to nicotine containing tobacco products. She knows that too.
But, taste aside, once I REALLY began educating myself to the expert level on ALL products calling themselves snus, or in the case of Camel SNUS, I realized one very important fact:
When I smoked regular Camels, I knew the risks. The Surgeon Generals report was already out. It was a personal decision motivated by nicotine addiction.
Camels were a little less expensive than Marlboro's, I liked their "Taste" better, and was a loyal customer for over 30 years.
When they told me light cigarettes were less harmful, I believed them and switched. Turns out they LIED TO ME!
When they told me Eclipse were the "least harmful" cigarette on the market, I believed them.
In fact, prior to my discovering snus, you will find NUMEROUS articles praising Eclipse.
They did make the cigarette odor go away so I'm grateful for that and one day I'll find out if they really were safer or not.
But as the Snus Guru...and if you can read and comprehend FACTS, the truth can not be denied:
-CamelSNUS being as reduced harm as Swedish snus is a LIE!
-Why on the snuscamel.com website, the OFFICIAL RJRT Website, is the animated spokesperson named "Olga", wearing tradition Swedish Clothes, standing in the snowy mountains you will NEVER see in North Carolina where CamelSNUS is made...
Why does "Olga" have link buttons for Travelling information in Sweden?
RJRT is not a travel agency, they don't sell CamelSNUS outside the US..in fact they sell it in less than 20 states as of today.
Why is CamelSNUS; and Marlboro snus with their "Invented in Sweden, Perfected in Marlboro Country" always trying to associate itself with Swedish Snus?
It's like saying "An old Ford Pinto, a new Rolls Royce: they both are cars so they are both the same thing."
Swedish Snus is NOT the same as SNUS or snus or Snus made elsewhere. The Swedish Government makes sure of that.
There is a HUGE difference in taste, health risks, cost, quantity, quality, and variety.
And add insult to injury, in this case the "old Pinto" costs MORE than the "Rolls Royce" AND was extremely unsafe (exploding gas tanks for those of you too young to remember).
If you even took the time to read this article (and yes, some of quotes were pompous...and even incorrect: that's what I was illustrating...the amount of LIES and MISINFORMATION, some from stupidity, some deliberate; all over the Internet.
Those FACTS I mention in just this light-hearted little piece, let alone if you'll take the time to actually read some of the other articles like the ones that go line by line through Camel's and Marlboro's website FAQ's AND EXPOSE how they border on false advertising.........
In fact, RJRT visits my blog daily. I see it in my reports. They actually CHANGED the CamelSNUS website based on what I pointed out.
But a major reason I use them, aside from CamelSNUS being the obvious and most aggressive of the new American snus manufacturers is this:
I Was a LOYAL CUSTOMER for over 30 YEARS and they LIED to me the whole time!
They created "light" cigarettes to MAKE MONEY and not lose market share, Period.
If they had told me there was no practical health difference between Filtered Camels and Camel Lights, I still would have smoked Camel Cigarettes. I knew the risks.
BUT THEY LIED to make sure I didn't go to another company selling "light" cigarettes.
If you take the time to READ the difference between most American "snus's" and REAL Swedish Snus, the health difference is SO GREAT that their "marketing tactics" are going to KILL PEOPLE unnecessarily!
And to top it off, they're going to rip you off at the cash register! Not just Camel: Marlboro and Skoal are even worse.
But I was a Proud Camel Customer with my Camel Lighter, my Camel hat, and all the other Camel stuff they gave away OR let you "earn" by buying enough of their cigarettes.
I was Brand Loyal to them for over 30 years and it turns out they were making a FOOL of me the whole time!
With cigarettes, you know the risks. But ALL these so-called "snus" products showing up are SO MUCH MORE DANGEROUS than Swedish Snus, and Camel in particular, has gone so far in their marketing to associate themselves with Swedish Snus that it was just too much.
Am I passionate about it? Your right.
Because THIS TIME, American smokers DON'T know the risks, they ARE NOT making an informed decision about their HEALTH, or the value they get for their money.
Because THIS TIME people who WOULD NOT have otherwise gotten cancer WILL! AND pay more for the privilege. And it's documented.
So much so, and so important is this FARCE by American Tobacco in general that shortly, I'll be taking the subject of snus OFF
this blog....and putting on the biggest, most feature and information packed website dedicated to snus on the PLANET! Very soon...sooner if I stopped responding to comments, especially going on this long.
READ MY ARTICLES, VERIFY the SOURCES, and when the new website is up, READ ALL the studies.
Then if you want to keep using CamelSNUS, or any other American snus, at least you'll be an educated user. In America, we still have some freedom of choice.
But don't blindly follow misleading marketing to an early grave and an empty wallet. BE AN INFORMED TOBACCO USER!
4. As to trying to convert you, if you'd like to know more about Jesus Christ, I would be happy discuss Him with you. But that concerns your immortal soul.
American "snus" concerns your very mortal health and financial health.
I may get passionate, but my point is to give YOU the FACTS and INFORMATION that sadly you and many others didn't see.
And there are 46 million cigarette smokers still in America....
GREED OVER SAFETY: in this case, the difference is so night and day that it CAN'T be ignored.
Learn the FACTS: then do what you want. Right now, YOUR comment is the uneducated, pompous one...just like the guy I quoted in the article.
Sincerely,
Mr UNZ
November 6, 2008 1:28 PM
Larry Waters makes this comment
Tuesday, 23 December 2008
Camel snus is perfect for us gals who are learning to snus. I ordered some Swedish snus and found it to be a bit bitter for my liking. I ordered a mixed roll and I think they are stronger than my liking. I prefer a milder taste. I had to spit a lot as well which to me defeats the purpose.
October 30, 2008 3:00 AM
Larry Waters makes this comment
Wednesday, 24 December 2008
There are a lot a gal Swedish snusers who would disagree with you but I understand your point.....American's in general: guys or gals; who have used Camel or other American Snus for a significant amount of time have had their tastes conditioned to the sickly sweet American flavor. Not your fault: If I had kept using Camel snus; especially if I liked the flavored varieties, it would be a struggle. Just remember; Swedish Snus is REAL snus. Snus is not SUPPOSED to taste the way American Snus does.........
That being said, I would recommend a few things. First of all, start out with mini portion Swedish Snus; not Original/Large..........Second, look for the mint and wintergreen flavors. Swedish Match's Catch Collection; in particular, Mini Mint; is specifically designed to introduce Camel Frost users to Real Swedish Snus. Other manufacturers are joining as well........Third, don't quit after the first portion: get through at least half the can before you make a decision. It does take time for your taste buds to adjust as I discovered when I did my American Snus Taste Tests. I spit out the first portions but forced myself to continue until they were almost OK, in a weak, watered down way. As long as your getting nicotine, you will adjust.........We're waiting to see what other new products are coming and plan to add more Tasting Kits to SnusCentral.com target to American Snus users trying to make the change. They'll be up by the end of the first quarter.........I hope you'll try again as Swedish snus is less harmfull than American Snus, has well over a hundred flavors, and is a better buy than American Snus.......If you ultimately can't break away from the sugar spiking and nicotine manipulation many American Snus manufacturers engage in and resign yourself to Camel SNUS, at least you tried.
.........Think about it and if you want some guidance, that's what we're all here for....
Sincerely,
Mr. UNZ
Larry Waters makes this comment
Monday, 09 February 2009
I vastly prefer the clean tobacco smell of Camel snus and the satisfaction it gives in the nicotine department. I went into the Swedish snus with an open mind and anticipation, but as stated above, find the product miserable and disgusting.
Larry Waters makes this comment
Friday, 20 February 2009
Larry Waters makes this comment
Friday, 20 February 2009
Thanks for being upfront about your employment..to everyone's delight, I'll be able to keep my response relatively short
Free samples aren't big with Swedish Snus as they are with American snus. One Manufacturer offers them but they want too much personal information including the last 4 numbers of your Social Security Number and Birth Date. With those to bits of information and your address, you are vulnerable to identity theft. Ever I opted out of the page when I saw that....... The most common free offers are the 'buy a roll (10 cans of the same snus), get X amount of extra cans of the same snus free' (usually two or three)........
Since you don't know what you like yet, I would not recommend buying rolls yet. If you're going to buy 10 cans, you're better off buying 10 different cans or 2 cans of 5 different snus's.........
SnusCentral.com does sell the Swedish Match Tasting Kits. They come in a few different varieties like Portion/White Portion, Loose, and Mini Portion. They're around $28. I'm working with That Snus Guy to create some SnusCENTRAL Tasting kits which include other brands as well as Swedish Match and be directed to Americans new to snus. They're not up on the site yet though.........
You can get a 10% discount at SnusCentral.com by using this discount code during checkout: LV2F8F. That's about the best I can offer..........
Stay in touch; either here or at SnusCENTRAL.org and let me how you like whatever you buy. There are plenty of suggestions over there on the different snus's too.....
If you need help, let me know.......
Sincerely,
Mr. UNZ
Larry Waters makes this comment
Tuesday, 24 February 2009
Chris makes this comment
Sunday, 29 March 2009
Larry Waters makes this comment
Wednesday, 01 April 2009
Sorry the portions/pouches comment went over your head. Reynolds understood it though. Camel is "popular" because many stores give away up to 10 usually expired, unrefrigerated cans with the purchase of a pack of Camel cigarettes; my cigarette brand of choice for over 30 years.
I don't think the Swedish Snus manufacturers took into consideration the desires of teen smokers when designing their marketing plans: it's ILLEGAL in OUR Country for teens to be buying ANY tobacco product at convenience stores, gas stations or anywhere else.
Are you saying the laws of the United States don't matter? Do you honestly believe the Swedes should intentionally market to underage kids? Are you saying convenience stores and gas stations which sell tobacco products in the United States should get a pass on breaking the law and selling to minors? What kind of American are YOU? You say I bash the USA...don't you realize your fixation on teen smokers makes America look like a Joke?........and what happens to your America-Bashing argument when Swedish Snus is available at convenience stores and gas stations too? Will that be OK with you because law-breaking store owners will make it convenient for minors to illegally purchase Swedish Snus?...........As to this not being Sweden, you're right. They BANNED cigarettes seven or eight years ago. America TAXES cigarettes supposedly to pay for smoker education programs for "the children".....looks to me like you are the one who doesn't give a damn about America. Let me guess; you support legalized marijuana too. If so-called Americans like you hit the back button, I'm grateful....... America has a bad enough reputation these days without its citizens wrapping themselves in the flag to support the illegal sale of tobacco to minors.....and if YOU are a teen smoker, then get off this site: like the entry page said: For people of LEGAL AGE ONLY.....Keep THAT in mind next time.
rlc1970 makes this comment
Thursday, 02 April 2009
Larry Waters makes this comment
Saturday, 04 April 2009
james makes this comment
Sunday, 05 April 2009
i the placed a order for 10 kinds of snus from sweden.
what a let down it is so bad the taste stinks. all 1o diffrent brands taste the same like crap.
convert makes this comment
Monday, 20 April 2009
Mr. UNZ makes this comment
Monday, 20 April 2009
Here's what I would suggest. Go to http://generalsnus.com. Get passed the age police and click on store locator on the top menu. Check and see if there is a Swedish Match dealer close to where you are. If there is, buy one can of General Mini Mint. If you're using Camel Frost and don't like Mini Mint better....enjoy your Camel Frost! It is worth a final shot though.
Sincerely,
Mr. UNZ
Mr. UNZ makes this comment
Monday, 20 April 2009
I also thank Camel for introducing me to snus. So do many others here. But like you, we discovered Swedish Snus and are much the better for it.
Roda Lacket is made by Swedish Match. If you'd like to thank them personally, on the top menu to the right, hover over Manufacturer Speak. In the drop-down, you will see Swedish Match. Feel free to ask them any questions you may have too. The reason they have a home here on SnusCentral.org is because Swedish Match wants to hear from their customers...one on one! They really do care.
Sincerely, UNZ.....I hope you joined SnusCentral.org too! It's free, you get a lot more access to the site, and we'd love to have you!
Mike makes this comment
Sunday, 26 April 2009
As a 15 year former smoker and a 3 year "dipper" I have tried several types of tobacco. I had to quit smoking as my job essentially made me, so when I was looking for alternatives the Skoal "pouches" (that's what they call them) worked best. I didn't like loose tobacco of traditional smokeless because of it getting in my teeth and harder to remove from my mouth in a hurry.
About a year into my smokeless switch, I was looking online for different brands that came in "pouches" (because Skoal is so expensive) when I came across snus. Intrigued, I wanted to know more, so I went about discovering the history of snus and its Scandinavian background. I found a website that sold many different brands and flavors and order a BUNCH. Seriously, because I wasn't sure what I would like, I must have bought 20+ different cans of various brands and flavors. Trying most of them through the course of the next several days, I really did like that it didn't require spitting and it did calm my nicotine cessation, however the flavors just didn't seem "bold" enough for me.
Recently, Camel "snus" became available in my area and since I had a coupon for a free can I decided to try it. I got the frost and was pleasantly surprised. It had the bold flavor I was looking for without the spitting; however, the level of nicotine was very much lacking and after a short while I was ready for another...unlike the Swedish snus or the Skoal pouches.
So, I think there is a certain Rochambeau (rock-paper-scissors) aspect to this which brings in the flavor vs. spitting vs. nicotine levels. I know as a connoisseur of the Swedish snus you find it satisfying on the flavor front, but I think it is open for debate as to what "tastes good."
I think it can be analogous to alcohol as one person mentioned Scotch earlier. I enjoy wine, both whites and reds...sometimes I'm in the mood for a Riesling other times for a Syrah/Shiraz, other times something else...but I always cringe when I hear someone order a White Zin. Perhaps it's a bit contemptuous for me to think they are wine idiots, but at the same time I wouldn't be able to discern the difference between a single malt or a blended scotch either...so I am an idiot to them.
I guess if there is a point in all of this, it is that what's considered "good" is subjective. For me, I wish there was something that appealed to me on all fronts and so far I have simply settled.
Mr. UNZ makes this comment
Monday, 27 April 2009
Excellent comment! Thanks for taking the time to put your thoughts to e-paper. This article was a little tongue-in-cheek and the point when I wrote it was to highlight the mass of misinformation about snus on the internet. It's an incredibly popular article but also the one I receive the most criticism on as it comes off to many as elitist. I used an elitist versus an American novice whose sole source of information was American Tobacco Companies and internet errors hoping to demonstrate how Americans were being deliberately taken advantage of by Big Tobacco. I also had fun writing it in an Old Time Religion style. Apparently what I intended and how some people read the article are worlds apart. I blame that on myself: I obviously did not craft the article well enough so that my point wasn't lost in the delivery. I've worked to improve that.......I was and am deeply offended by especially Reynolds original Camel SNUS website, the "information" it provided and even to a lesser degree still does today. Reynolds changed the Camel website over time in direct response to my individual detailing of each and every misleading or inaccurate point. Today, camelsnus.com is just a puff marketing site that's not worth the energy to dissected. I'm glad that this is now the case and proud (not egotistical) to know that I had a hand in that happening. It does concern me Reynolds still makes a big deal about not swallowing the Camel SNUS pouch. What is that thing made of anyway?........ To use your wine analogy, it's not someone ordering a White Zin with beef out of lack of wine experience that outrages me. It would be the White Zin manufacturer advertising that their $4/bottle white Zin is not only in the same league as, but a better alternative to a Porterhouse steak then a 1982 Penfold's Grange Hermitage (talk about a phenomenal wine! My opinion of course; you may disagree)......Even when reviewing Swedish Snus, I would say "taste is in the mouth of the beholder". Well, a lot of the time. I forget more recently probably because my snus palate has matured to the point I can discern the difference......I'm also very opinionated and am not ashamed of it. The main reason I sought out and was so grateful when That Snus Guy started writing on SnusCENTRAL was that he bends over backwards and prides himself on writing "objective" reviews. He has his likes and dislikes but he intentionally does not incorporate them in his reviews. He concentrates on mouth feel, drink pairing, and taste description without judgment. His motivation was and is that when he first discovered snus, he couldn't find objective reviews. That became his mission and he does it extraordinarily well. I wanted to be counter-balanced on SnusCENTRAL when it came to reviews because I am opinionated. I do admit that his Camel Frost review was incredibly difficult for me to press the Publish button on, but I don't believe or practice editorial control. I welcome differing approaches and opinions so long as they are grounded in something real......Reynolds offends me on a lot of levels. In the Member Forum (I hope you join if you haven't already so you can read these..Membership is free), there is a thread called "Camel Snus Loose?". It was inspired by an email I received asking if you could tear open the Camel SNUS pouches and use the contents as a loose snus. The Member responses were not "eeew, Camel sucks!". They were scientific experiments starting with weighing the contents on a digital scale, an evaluation of the contents, how much Camel SNUS it took to make a pris, and the like. (I'm very proud of our Members).....I hate to summarize in a sentence or two as they are so well written and comprehensive, but it became apparent from the amount of stems found in Camel SNUS to indicate it contains the cheapest possible tobacco sold at a premium price. Let's compare Camel SNUS to Marlboro Snus.....I'm in the process of writing an article revisiting Marlboro Snus. I have also been equally as critical of Philip Morris USA, if not more so, then Reynolds, and thought this article would be extremely critical but with updated information. It's not going to be. No one was or will be more surprised than I when it's finally published. I may be opinionated, but never at the expense of facts......Back to Camel versus Swedish. Reynolds offends me on so many levels; quality, marketing, pricing, taste/contents, and especially treating their brand-loyal customers as clay to be molded regardless of the facts that I am particularly critical of the entire "Camel SNUS" package; especially compared to Swedish Snus.....as I often do say, if someone likes and uses the most carcinogenic American chewing tobacco on the market, as long as they are informed consumers, America still kind of has freedom of choice.....Who am I to throw a stone: I smoked for over 35 years knowing full well the risks....I thought. I switched to light cigarettes not for the taste but because they were supposed to be less harmful. Now we know there is no practical difference between regular and light cigarettes: it was just a marketing ploy. Would I have quit smoking had I known then what I know now? No. I'm nicotine addicted and like tobacco. But I wouldn't have switched to light cigarettes; which are probably more profitable too? No. I thought I was an informed consumer and I wasn't. I was mislead like millions of other smokers. THAT I don't like........As to Swedish Snus? The facts are out there and my mission is to make sure they see the light of day. Like you, I started out with 20+ cans of Swedish Snus and as I've chronicled in other articles, there were some I didn't like; even some that ended up in the trash (and I hate to waste anything). But there were others I fell in love with and continue to: in just the two years since I discovered SNUS and Swedish Snus, there are so many new brands and flavors that my original "top three" are not the same as my current top three. Six months from now, they may be different again. And my top three may not be the same as anyone elses which makes neither of us wrong. What it does mean is that on a level playing field, we enjoy different tastes. But it is a level playing field because the Swedish government intelligently regulates Swedish Snus so that health concerns are addressed, the consumer is informed, and an overall superior product is made transparently available at a great retail price to American consumers and a healthy profit to the manufacturers. I say American consumers because Sweden is taxing snus in Sweden like the US Federal and State governments do with cigarettes: excessively......I am not and have never been a fan of Big Government but I am in favor of FDA regulating all tobacco products including snus. But in the case of snus, only so long as it's done as the Swedish do; for public safety, consumer transparency, and to ensure the safest possible and best possible product is available. The key phrase there: "is available". I share your opinion of White Zinfandel but it isn't any more dangerous to drink than any other wine, it's generally priced appropriately against finer wines, and as you say taste is subjective. If someone prefers machine made cigars over a Cuban Montecristo: or more likely can't afford Cuban cigars because of this outdated & counter-productive cold war trade embargo against Cuba, so be it. I may cringe but I'm not the one smoking them........Most Americans discovering snus, like myself 2 years ago, thought it was a new invention of Big American Tobacco. They and I had/have no idea that snus is a Swedish invention with a 200 year history, is truly and is documented as the most reduced harm tobacco product on the planet, and has such a wide selection at a fraction of the price of Camel SNUS. THAT's what I want to change. Once American and Swedish Snus can be compared apples to apples on more than just taste, then let the informed consumer choose whatever they like. So long as they are informed consumers and know what they are putting in their mouths and bodies.
Sincerely,
UNZ
Mike makes this comment
Monday, 27 April 2009
Also, could you please answer a question that has always bothered me...What is the compartment in the lid of most snus cans used for?
Thanks,
Mike
miracle makes this comment
Tuesday, 28 April 2009
Mr. UNZ makes this comment
Tuesday, 28 April 2009
Mr. UNZ makes this comment
Tuesday, 28 April 2009
UNZ
BC makes this comment
Tuesday, 05 May 2009
thanks!
bruna makes this comment
Wednesday, 06 May 2009
mr. unz, you may have come across as a little douche-baggy with the portion comment, etc. people may be put off by some of the comments and may not try the swedish snus, just saying...
Larry Waters makes this comment
Sunday, 10 May 2009
Larry Waters makes this comment
Sunday, 10 May 2009
Shawn makes this comment
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
Where are your studies saying Swedish snus is safer? Who were those studies funded by? What is the definition of "safer"? Does it mean one cancer death in 1000? Please define your bold statements...and substantiate with facts proven in studies.
This wasn't totally useless however...you did shed light on the portion sizes. I would have liked for you to have spoken about nicotene content. A bigger pouch doesn't mean a bigger punch.
Next time...less propaganda and more fact.
Larry Waters makes this comment
Tuesday, 12 January 2010
If you haven't guessed from the title of this article, I was trying a different style with this article. You're not the only one who didn't appreciate it so don't feel bad.
Those studies and facts have been written about since this article was first published in 2008. What is the implication of who funded the studies? Every FDA approved drug on the market received approvals based on studies funded by Big Pharma.
There is a great article on nicotine by Dr. Lars Erik Rutqvist you should read.
And you are correct: a bigger pouch doesn't mean a bigger punch. The amount of free nicotine and the pH level of the snus do. That's why Marlboro publishes just under 8mg/g of TOTAL nicotine but only 1.4mg/g of free nicotine in Marlboro Snus.
Camel SNUS claims 8mg nicotine per pouch but SNUS is very low moisture....dry as dirt actually. They don't publish their free nicotine levels but why should they?
ALL American made snus is marketed as a complimentary product to cigarettes; not a replacement...."When you can't smoke, SNUS!"
Swedish Snus is marketed as a replacement for cigarettes, a stand-alone product, and the least harmful way to enjoy tobacco.
Swedish Snus is virtually harm-free especially compared to cigarettes. On average, cigarettes contain 548 ppm of TSNA's. (tobacco specific carcinogens). Swedish Snus averages 1 ppm or less.
The Swedish Health Dept. removed the "This product causes mouth cancer" warning based on 30 years of science...and because it doesn't cause cancer.
Swedish snus is about as dangerous as French Roast coffee or grilled hotdogs. All the substantiation you want is on the site. If I repeated all of it in every single article I wrote, each one would be about 50 pages long and unreadable.
Thanks for taking the time to comment! Feel free to use the site to learn the truth.
Larry
Shawn makes this comment
Wednesday, 13 January 2010
Larry Waters makes this comment
Saturday, 16 January 2010
The site is yours...that's why it's here. Feel free to ask any questions or comment. The Members are all very friendly and helpful.
BR
Larry
jb makes this comment
Thursday, 04 February 2010
Thanks for the work you have done. I also am an America who uses Swedish snus (General white portion).
The reason that i came across your site was that i was doing a little research. Usually, google is a wonderful reasearch assistant, but, this time, i was having trouble finding concrete statistics for carcinogen ppm for specific american brand cigarettes and tobacco-related products. On the other hand, finding statistics about Swedish snus was, and is, relatively easy.
As i am new to your site, i am unaware if you have made posts comparing the current research data. If this data has been compiled by you, then would you mind directing me?
Furthermore, i, also, have been compiling my own data--which was recently halted due to conflicting/ambiguous data on american cigarette carcinogens--and i can supply you with my findings along with, of course, the supporting data. Essentially, my data points out the difference between carcinogenic intake between an average smoker and an average snus user: the resulting data is mind-boggling.
Again, while my data is supported by collected research data, i lack 'specific' data on popular american cigarette brands--such as Camel and Marlboro--and would like (if you can help me here, i would be greatly appreciative) to site the carcinogens per parts per million (ppm) specific within American cigarette brand names instead of doing a general comparison.
Thanks again for your work here--and please email me if you are interesting in my results and/or if you can help me locate more specific information regarding American brand cigarettes.
Jb
Larry Waters makes this comment
Thursday, 04 February 2010
There is a very good reason you can't find specific nitrosamine levels for American cigarettes: the manufacturers don't publish it or talk about it. If one good thing comes out of The Tobacco Act, I hope they will be forced to disclose the TSNA levels of their cigarettes.
Swedish Snus manufacturers, as you noted, are very forthcoming with TSNA levels. Some American snus manufacturers do also, but very few. They have the "Old Cigarette Guy" mentality.
Talking in general about carcinogen levels in cigarettes is very challenging except to say the risks are high. Take an unlit cigarette, light it, and suddenly you have 4000 to 6000 toxic substances created. Combustion is what makes a cigarette so dangerous.
Recently, scientists have increased the number of possible carcinogens in a lit cigarette to 10,000. Here's the scary part: these extra substances they have found in cigarette smoke are largely classified as "dangerous but we're not quite sure what some of them even are".
Yet between FDA and the Tobacco Act, the pending PACT Act, and of course the insane EU Snus Ban, cigarettes still remain the easiest form of tobacco to obtain world-wide.
I'd be very interested in seeing your study. Be expecting an email.
Sincerely,
Larry
aka Mr. UNZ